When I started writing this post, I was going to write this whole long manifesto about Style and Fashion; how they’re different, and why I think “having style” is better than, “being fashionable.” Then I looked in the dictionary. “Crap,” I said.
4. an elegant, fashionable, or luxurious mode of living: to live in style.
5. a mode of fashion, as in dress, esp. good or approved fashion; elegance; smartness.
2. a particular, distinctive, or characteristic mode of action or manner of acting: They do these things in a grand style.9. a particular, distinctive, or characteristic mode or form of construction or execution in any art or work: Her painting is beginning to show a personal style.
What this says to me is that, basically, if you are fashionable, you are always stylish. But you aren’t always fashionable if you are said to have “style”. Or, put another way, if A is being stylish, and B is being fashionable, all fashionable things have style, but not all stylish things are fashionable.
In essence, Style is the way that one expresses oneself. It might be through things that are “In Fashion” (e.g. skinny jeans, hooker boots) or through things that are unique, interesting, and fit your personality, but aren’t necessarily a popular type of clothing at the moment (e.g. these shoes). Personally, I think that it’s better to have style than be fashionable. However, I am terribly biased because, although I can be said to have style, I will probably never be “fashionable” (except by accident). Nevertheless, I will, from time to time, post things that I think are stylish and/or fashionable on this blog, with commentary. I don’t think I can be single-minded enough to make this a “fashion” (style?) blog, but I will probably post about clothes here. The hope is that this post helps to clarify what I mean when I talk about stylish things.